On the stability of social preferences in inter-group conflict

Author(s)
Robert Böhm, Jürgen Fleiß, Robert Rybnicek
Abstract

Despite the omnipresence of inter-group conflicts, little is known about the heterogeneity and stability of individuals’ social preferences toward in-group and out-group members. To identify the prevalence and stability of social preferences in inter-group conflict, we gather quota-representative, incentivized data from a lab-in-the-field study during the heated 2016 Austrian presidential election. We assess social preferences toward in-group and out-group members one week before, one week after, and three months after the election. We find considerable heterogeneity in individuals’ group-(in)dependent social preferences. Utilizing various econometric strategies, we find largely stable social preferences over the course of conflict. Yet, there is some indication of variation, particularly when the conflict becomes less salient. Variation is larger in social preferences toward in-group members and among specific preference types. We discuss the theoretical implications of our findings and outline potential avenues for future research.

Organisation(s)
External organisation(s)
University of Copenhagen, Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz
Journal
The Journal of Conflict Resolution
Volume
65
Pages
1215-1248
No. of pages
34
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002721994080
Publication date
07-2021
Peer reviewed
Yes
Austrian Fields of Science 2012
501021 Social psychology
Keywords
ASJC Scopus subject areas
General Business,Management and Accounting, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science
Portal url
https://ucrisportal.univie.ac.at/en/publications/24a1f95b-3310-45a5-8d4a-467adc8a19bf