Who comments, commends, and complains in online scientific studies?

Author(s)
Lau Lilleholt, Robert Böhm, Ingo Zettler
Abstract

Whereas research has investigated links between personality and commenting behavior on various online platforms, research testing who comments positively, neutrally, or negatively in online scientific studies is missing. Herein, we tackle this gap, considering the HEXACO personality dimensions. Relying on a COVID-19 survey (N = 8,809), we find that, as compared to their counterparts, people high in Openness to Experience comment more; that people high in Extraversion and Openness to Experience commend more; and that those high in Emotionality write both more neutral comments and fewer complaints. Notably, these relations all appear to be modest. Combined, our findings provide novel insights into the relations between personality and commenting behavior in online scientific studies, suggesting that—while people with certain personality characteristics comment more in specific ways than others—researchers need not to worry too much that the comments they receive are overly biased.

Organisation(s)
Department of Occupational, Economic and Social Psychology
External organisation(s)
University of Copenhagen
Journal
Personality Science
Volume
2023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5964/ps.7537
Publication date
10-2023
Peer reviewed
Yes
Austrian Fields of Science 2012
501021 Social psychology
Portal url
https://ucrisportal.univie.ac.at/en/publications/who-comments-commends-and-complains-in-online-scientific-studies(61b936ca-dc04-413c-bd9f-a2682b065e11).html